Page 48 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 48

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

               The continued repression can only lead to more violence, and this is something the
               government must take note of in its reconciliation attempts. These various forms of

               ad hoc obstructions to memorialization, be it from the government of the day or by
               non-State actors-there have been a point of frustration for many affected families.

               However, they have braved these threats, intimidation, obstructions, and restrictions
               to remember, despite fears of reprisal, their loved ones. Their courage is testimony

               to the innate human quality, and they need to be remembered.


               The space for memory in the post-war Eastern and Northern areas of Sri Lanka is

               dominated  by  the  triumphant  discourse,  which  denies  freedom  for  an  alternative
               narration,  making  the  truth  of  the  losers.  All  are  victims  are  annually  waiting  to

               commemorate  their  lost  loved  ones.  Today  victims  still  need  to  struggle  to
               remember their dead ones despite intimidation and surveillance. Why would there be

               the extra deployment of military, police, and other intelligence services on the day

               of  mourning?  On  the  verge  of  national  consultations  if  people  have  no space  for
               memorialization,  how  would  there  be  a space  for  free  expression  of  what  people

               need in terms of a just mechanism.


               Concluding Observation


               Memorializing  the  people  who  died  in  the  war  and  airing  the  grievances  of  the
               people need to be recognized as a right of the people in a meaningful reconciliation

               process. But  after  the  war,  the  memorials  of  memories  are  dominated  by  the

               influential political persons and designed according to their agendas. In the post-war
               context, the war memorialization was handled by parties, and only they glorify their

               war  heroism.  The  monuments  have  been  constructed  all  over  the  country  by  the

               victorious parties, and losers as well; war monuments have limited in the northern
               part  of  the  country.  The  state  practice  of  memorialization  has  been  selective  and

               aimed at ethnic chauvinism. Even in the eastern and northern regions, some places
               are dotted with several war monuments erected by the state to glorify the victory of



                                                       39
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53