Page 22 - Proceedings-edit-2021_09_20-final
P. 22

© Proceedings of the Ruhuna Quality Assurance Sessions 2021 (RUQAS 2021)
              st
            21  September 2021

            more than three  responses  under the criteria “needs  improvement”. Moreover, the balance between
            project  monitoring  and  control  activities  and  the  administrative  burden  on  partners  is  rated  under

            “needs improvement” according to results. However, this criterion did not receive a particularly low

            score in the average performance assessment, suggesting that the view that it needs improvement is not
            widely  held.  Furthermore,  there  was  a  response  that  assesses  the  project  performance  is  poor  with

            regard to the effectiveness of project events and activities. From further comments, it was understood
            that this  assessment relates to  the quality  reduction  in  events  as a  consequence of  all events  being

            online due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Annual project reporting from each partner shows that all work
            packages  have  commenced,  substantial  progress  has  been  achieved,  have  been  completed,  or  are

            proceeding accordingly. Therefore, amidst the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, the project can be

            considered  to  be  proceeding  well  in  most  of  the  areas.  The  absence  of  studies  in  laboratories  and
            fieldwork can be a possible reason for low impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on project activities.
























                                  Figure 1: Comparison chart of meeting evaluations


                                                          rd
                                                  nd
            Except for the kick-off meeting, the 2  and 3 steering committee meetings of the project were held
            using online platforms. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the average evaluations from each of the 3

            meetings held during the first year. Further, it depicts that evaluation levels for most of the criteria
            have decreased with time. Furthermore, results from the participants’ evaluations show that quality

                           nd
                                  rd
            indicators of 2  and 3  steering committee meetings were not highly evaluated as much as the kick-
                                                                          nd
                                                                                rd
            off meeting. The decline in participants’ satisfaction from the 2 to 3  meeting as shown in Figure 1
            was reflected by comments from participants as well. For instance, participants pointed out that having
            to do increasingly complex and interconnected project operations solely online is a major reason for
            the growing dissatisfaction. Furthermore, reduction in participants’ tolerance for technical glitches and

            sub-optimal use of online communication platforms have been highlighted as a severe problem since
            several  issues  arose  during  online  meetings  such  as  unclear  sounds,  repetition  of  contents,  and

            disturbances caused by unmuted microphones. According to the results, three areas were highlighted

                                                             5
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27