Page 17 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 17

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

               scientific  inquiry’  (Santos  2014:  120).  This  is  an  important  distinction  about  two
               knowledge types.


               He argues that today ‘we must start from the verification that the theory of history of

               modernity  is  untenable  (and)  human  initiative  rather  than  any  abstract  idea  of
               progress is what grounds hope’ (Santos 2014: 89).  We need to replace modernity

               paradigm with another paradigm (Santos 2014: 88). While ‘the paradigm of Western
               modernity  postulates  a  dialectical  tension  between  social  regulation  and  social

               emancipation’,  in  Santos’s  view,  ‘the  most  important  problem  is  the  collapse  of

               social  emancipation  into  social  regulation’  (Santos  2014:  71).  Hence  as  social
               scientists our challenge is to regenerate emancipation. ‘Because science and hence

               the social sciences as we know them are part and parcel of the project of Western
               modernity, they are much more part of the problem rather than the solution’ (Santos

               2014: 72).  To face this challenge social sciences must undergo radical change.


               He  further  says,  the  structure  of  modern  knowledge  has  ‘led  to  total  primacy  of

               knowledge-as-regulation’  (2014:139).  Modern  science  has  become  the  privileged
               form  of  knowledge-as-regulation  and  it  has  deserted  knowledge-as-emancipation

               (2014:156).  Thus,  ‘global  social  injustice  is  intimately  linked  to  global  cognitive
               injustice (and) the struggle for global social justice must therefore be a struggle for

               global  cognitive  justice  as  well’  (2014:124).  This  statement  has  profound

               implications for sociology theory and practice.


               Connell  clarifies  the  respective  roles  of  anthropology  and  sociology  in  historical
               context by stating that anthropology became ‘the designated intellectual container

               for primitive societies’ (2007: x) and argues,


                       The  rest  of  social  science  formed  itself  on  ethnocentric  assumptions  that

                       amounted  to  a  gigantic  lie-  that  modernity  created  itself  within  the  North
                       Atlantic  world,  independent  of  the  rest  of  humanity.  Models  constructed

                       based on that lie, such as functionalist sociology, modernization theory and

                                                        8
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22