Page 18 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 18

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

                       neoclassical economics, were then exported to the rest of the world with all
                       the authority of the most advanced knowledge, and all the weight of First

                       World wealth and power (Connell, 2007: x).


               Though there are attempts made to correct this, metropolitan sciences continuously
               update at home and are exported. Furthermore, ‘Metropolitan theory is distributed

               through  a  global  network  of  institutions  including  universities,  scientific
               organizations,  journals  and-as  Arturo  Escobar  (1995)  has  eloquently  shown-

               development institutions from the World Bank down’ (Connell 2007: xi). A point

               Connell  makes  is  that  ‘(t)o  the  degree  that  the  making  of  modernity  has  been  a
               world-historical process, it can as well be narrated from its undersides as it can from

               its  self-proclaimed  centres—like  those  maps  that,  as  a  cosmic  joke,  invert  planet
               earth to place the south on top, the north below’ (Connell 2007:117).



               Comaroff  &  Comaroff  (2012)  also  question  ‘the  universal  premises  of  Euro-
               American social theory founded on modernity and enlightenment’ (2012: 116). They

               believe  that  ‘(a)s  an  ideology,  it  has  never  been  dissociable  from  capitalism’
               (Comaroff  &  Comaroff  2012:  116).  Moreover,  ‘Other  modernity’s  are  treated  as

               transplants of the Euro-original’ (2012:114). The meaning of modernity however ‘is
               dependent on context, serving to put people in  particular times and places on the

               near-or-far  side  of  the  great  divide  between  self  and  other,  the  present  and

               prehistory, the general and particular—oppositions that are mobilized in a range of
               registers from theologies to party platforms’ (Comaroff & Comaroff 2012: 119). The

               positivist social sciences, modernist sociological theory ascendant from the 1950s,
               deployed this grammar of oppositions such as foundational contrasts as mechanical

               versus organic solidarity, status vs. contract, pre capitalist vs. capitalist (Comaroff &
               Comaroff 2012:119). Though ‘Colonial/postcolonial studies … has taken pains to

               transcend the assumptions and methods of modernization theory’ (2012: 119), the

               question remains as to whether Sociologists in the global south, in this case South
               Asia have done so sufficiently?


                                                        9
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23