Page 19 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 19

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

               In view of these observations on the historical unfolding of dominant epistemologies
               and theories emanating from the global north, as social scientists we have a duty to

               critically  investigate  ‘the  concealed  contradictions  of  capitalist  modernity’
               (2012:117)  and  the  role  of  metropolitan  theory  in  the  context  of  South  Asia  in

               relation to knowledge construction in sociology and other social sciences.


               Crisis of Sociology in the South Asian Context


               Several critical reviews exist on the introduction and institutionalisation of sociology

               including  social  anthropology  and  resulting  practices,  issues,  and  challenges  in
               South  Asian  countries.    These  include  Patel  (1998,  2006,  2010,  2014),  Sengupta

               (1997,  1999),  Vasavi  (2011),  Modi  (2010),  Srinivasan  (2010),  Kais  (2010),  Sabir
               (2010, 2016), Perera (2012), Hettige (2010), Gamage 2015), Islam (2004), Thakur

               (2015),  Misra  (2005),  and  Karim  (2014).    There  are  also  some  book  reviews  by

               South  Asian  sociologists  and  social  anthropologists  that  contain  contemporary
               observations.  Speeches by Presidents of Sociological Association of India and some

               conference  reports  on  sociology  in  South  Asia  also  provide  further  clues  on  the
               evolving nature of the subject and the challenges it faces.


               There  is  a  strong  line  of  argument  in  these  writings  emphasising  the  fact  that

               sociology practice in South Asia is excessively embedded in the Western hegemonic
               knowledge  and  methodologies.  When  European  and  American  perspectives  and

               theories  were  exported  to  other  countries,  they  have  become  dominant  universal

               models (Patel 2010: 3).  Citing Alatas (1974), Patel observes that ‘such domination
               organized an array of sociological practices, including those that dealt with teaching,

               such as import of syllabi and textbooks, and research’ (Patel 2010: 3-4). Imported

               models included ‘what to study, how to study and what is considered best practice in
               research, including the evaluation of research projects and the protocols of writing,

               and presenting empirical and theoretical articles in journals’ (Patel, 2010: 4).





                                                       10
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24