Page 23 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 23

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

               with a similar crisis in higher education. Issues of pedagogy, the learning process,
               the quality of curriculum, infrastructure, and financial autonomy are entangled with

               “what to study” and “how to study”, issues that concern us as sociologists’ (1998:
               339). According to her, ‘Paradoxically, these challenges are embedded in the very

               institutions  that  had  encouraged  sociology’s  formation  and  defined  its  conceptual
               map:  the  institutions  of  the  nation-state  that  advocated  development,  macro  level

               agendas,  and uniform  policy implementation’ (Patel 1998:  340). Almost  17 years

               after making these remarks, they are equally applicable to the crisis of sociology in
               South Asia even today.


               Vasavi’s  view  about  Indian  sociology  and  anthropology  is  that  today  they  have

               reached  an  impasse.  She  believes  that  ‘the  SOI  seems  fragmented  and  diluted,
               unable to forge an identity of its own, respond to changing times, and generate new

               schools  of  theory,  methods,  and  perspectives’  (Vasavi  2011:  402).    Among  the

               factors  contributing  to  this  situation  ‘are  the  institutional  contexts,  the  politics  of
               knowledge production, the state of discipline’s syllabi and pedagogies, its limited

               methodologies, the entrenchment of some approaches and theories, and the inability
               of sociologists to engage with and contribute to public debates either in the vicinity

               or  at  the  national  level’  (Vasavi  2011:  402).    She  in  turn  reviews  each  of  these

               factors in some detail.


               In  her  review  of  the  conference  proceedings  noted  above,  Patel  observed  that
               ‘Sociologists in South Asia are attempting to move beyond the assumed frame that

               has always defined the terms of their discussions and research agendas’ (1998: 339).
               However, some sociological traditions ‘have not evolved perspectives and theories

               to  assess  their  relationship  with  dominant  universalized  traditions,  although  they
               have been recognized’ (Patel 2010: 17).  The question remains as to what extent a

               paradigm shift has occurred in South Asian sociology?






                                                       14
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28