Page 20 - rohana_journal_No_12-2020-final
P. 20

Research Journal of the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka- Rohana 12, 2020

               However, a  corresponding argument  in  relation  to  the later phases  of discipline’s
               development is that it is not sufficiently embedded in global sociology due to the

               way sociology was institutionalised in South Asian countries after the nationalistic
               phase of development, i.e., use of local languages, regional university cultures and

               practices as well as factors such as the brain drain of region’s sociologists who had
               their training in Western higher education institutions. Both these arguments need

               critical scrutiny.


               The state sponsorship of higher education, politicization of university administration

               and the academia, creation of institutional impediments for the growth of sociology
               relevant to the South Asian context are other themes discussed in the literature.  This

               resulted  in  the  methodological  nationalism.  Sociologists  in  the  region  claim  that
               today,  sociology  research  and  practice  are  embedded  in  nationalistic  and

               developmentalist  sociology  and  anthropology  guided  and  funded  by  the  state,

               multilateral development agencies and international NGOs that employ local social
               scientists  as  consultants  depriving  of  their  time  and  energy  for  producing  social

               theory  relevant  to  the  South  Asian  context.  Some  of  their  practices  are  not  only
               nationalistic but also nativist. Sociology research, practice and teaching have been

               subjected  to  the  developmentalist  agenda  of  the  governments,  neglecting  deeper

               epistemological  work.  In  Nepal,  ‘the  developmentalist  and  functionalist  vision,
               which  remains  dominant,  has  de-emphasised  the  teaching  and  research  on

               frameworks and themes such as politics, conflict, struggle, resistance, etc.’ (Misra
               2005:101).


               A significant rupture has been created between local sociology practices and those

               of the metropolitan sociology or indeed global sociology. Some confess that there is
               a  lack  of  innovation,  creativity  and  application  of  Western  derived  sociological-

               social  anthropology  knowledge  frameworks/paradigms  properly  by  the  new

               generation,  which  is  disconnected  from  Western-oriented  knowledge  to  the  local
               context  compared  to  the  previous  generation  of  sociologists  and  social


                                                       11
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25