Page 138 - Proceedings-edit-2021_09_20-final
P. 138

© Proceedings of the Ruhuna Quality Assurance Sessions 2021 (RUQAS 2021)
              st
            21  September 2021

            environmental  context  (Anishka  and  Thushara,  2016).  Within  the  Sri  Lankan  context,  the  national
            government is making a substantial investment on free education and, therefore, student dropout is a

            serious  issue  which  affects  both  the  country’s  education  system  and  its  economy.  Dropout  of

            undergraduates  from  government  universities  raise  several  concerns  within  the  universities;  the
            efficiency  of  the  universities  is  being  questioned,  the  quality  of  the  academic  programs  is  being

            questioned,  the  management  system  of  the  universities  is  being  questioned  and  may  damage  the
            reputation of the university (Bedregal-Alpaca et al., 2020). On one hand, a high percentage of student

            dropout exacerbates the lack of highly qualified individuals in the labour market that is predicted for
            the  next  few  decades  (Vogler-Ludwig  et  al.,  2016).  On  the  other  hand,  only  a  limited  number  of

            students are being selected for the government universities. From a societal point of view, dropout is

            argued to be a waste of tax resources due to the individual blocking a university place that could have
            been taken by another student (Sosu and Pheunpha, 2019). Considering this issue at the personal level,

            it appears that dropout is often associated with personal failure, and both waste of time and monetary

            investments (Behr et al., 2019).


            In the United States, the overall dropout rate of undergraduate college students is estimated at 40%. In
            Germany, the dropout rate is nearly 29% (Behr et al., 2019). According to the data from the Higher

            Education Statistics Agency of the United Kingdom, 6% of first-degree entrants aged under 21 who
            enrolled in 2013-2014 years did not continue their studies beyond their first year. In countries that

            belong to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 12% of students who enter a
            full-time bachelor’s program, on average, leave the tertiary system before beginning their second year

            of study. This percentage increases to 20% by the end of the program’s theoretical duration and to 24%

            three years later. In all countries with available data, women have higher completion rates than men in
            BA programs (Sandoval-Palis et al., 2020). But the empirical evidence on undergraduate dropout in Sri

            Lanka is very limited. In the Faculty of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, the number of students
            who have dropped out or not completed as a fraction of the total number of students in a batch are

            alarmingly  high;  above  2/5  of  the  batch  in  2006  intake  and  over  and  above  1/5  in  other  intakes

            (Anishka  and  Thushara,  2016).  The  seriousness  of  the  dropout  problem  can  be  evidenced  through
            many studies which have been carried out to analyze the dropout issue, to detect the main variables

            involved, to determine the scope of those variables, to model the dropout process so to organize it into
            many  of  its  subproblems,  to  get  a  better  understanding  of  its  dynamic  and  of  the  sub-processes  it

            involves,  always  aiming  at  a  better  understanding  of  the  whole  problem  in  an  attempt  to

            prevent/minimize it. The term “dropout” is commonly used to describe the situation of students who
            enroll at a certain institution of education and leave without obtaining a diploma or passing their final





                                                            121
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143