Page 164 - Proceedings-edit-2021_09_20-final
P. 164

© Proceedings of the Ruhuna Quality Assurance Sessions 2021 (RUQAS 2021)
              st
            21  September 2021

            validity of the data. Total Cronbach’s alpha for each questionnaire (CC- 0.819, DC- 0.890, AC- 0.850,
            PSQ- 0.835 and USQ- 0.839) verified the accepted reliability level of the data.


            Respondent’s ratings against each survey item were calculated according to the scale value (1-7) and
            summated against the respondent. Then the average score per each key variable (CC, DC, AC, PSQ,

            and  USQ)  was  calculated  by  dividing  the  sum  of  the  score  for  the  variable  by  the  number  of

            respondents. Averages for key variables (CC, DC, AC, PSQ, and USQ) were summated to obtain the
            total per university library (Table 1).  The results indicate that the agility capabilities and competitive

            capabilities  are  higher  than  the  dynamic  capabilities  in  all  libraries  and  the  service  providers’
            perception of service quality is higher than the users’ perception of services quality (Figure 2). Yet,

            agility capabilities and competitive capabilities showed variations among libraries.


                             150

                             100                                                         CC ave.
                                                                                         DC ave.

                              50                                                         AC ave.

                                                                                         PQ ave.

                               0                                                         UQ ave.
                                   ULib- ULib- ULib- ULib- ULib-5 ULib- ULib- ULib-
                                    1     2     3     4           6     7     8


                    Figure 2: Perceived resource capabilities and perceived service quality in university libraries
            To determine the overall integrated quality level per university, firstly, the maximum possible score

            per each key variable was calculated by multiplying the maximum scale value (7) by the number of
            survey items (16x7=112, 14x7 =98, 16x7=112, 22x7=154, and 22x7=154) and summated the products

            together  (112+98+112+154+154=  630).  Secondly,  the  total  score  per  university  library

            (CC+DC+AC+PSQ+USQ)  was  divided  by  the  maximum  possible  score  (630)  according  to  the
            following formula.



                                    CC average + DC average + AC average +PSQ average + USQ average
                                                                                                                                                                            ,

                      ISQ            =
                                                           630
            where,

                    ISQ= Integrated service quality,    CCaverage  = average score for competitive capabilities,
                    DCaverage = average score for dynamic capabilities,

                    ACaverage  = average score for agility capabilities,
                    PSQaverage = average score for providers’ perception,


                    USQaverage = average score for users’ perception.
                                                            147
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169